Give each customer question context and an owner.

Organize messages and history, find approved reference material, and prepare tickets with source-backed reply drafts.

Discuss your workflow

Is this a good fit?

Support teams receive repeated questions about specifications, packaging and order status, with current references and clear routing owners.

When to improve the process first

An outdated knowledge base or an undefined refund policy needs attention before customer-facing automation.

Recurring work this can handle

  • Classify specification, packaging and order-status questions
  • Summarize prior exchanges and cite current information
  • Route complaints and unsupported answers to an owner

What design starts with

Typical questions, current product and service information, and people responsible for order checks, complaints and special requests.

Confirm access and review for your project.

These are workflows we can design. Sources, connections, fields, permissions and human review are agreed before implementation and acceptance. They are not a list of ready-made connectors.

Not sure this fits your business?

Steps from source material to result

Illustrative workflow · Fictional data
Customer question to sourced draft

What is the status of our last order? Please also send the specifications for X20.

Order and conversation context

Approved product catalog · X20 / v2

Reply draft

X20 specifications located. The operations team still needs to confirm the order status.

Route the status check to operations
  1. 01

    Receive the question and match permitted customer records

  2. 02

    Summarize history and retrieve current reference material

  3. 03

    Prepare a ticket and reply draft with sources

  4. 04

    Staff verify the response and route exceptions to an owner

Inputs your team provides

  • Sanitized messages, permitted customer history and product material
  • Question categories, order-access scope and routing rules

Outputs your team can inspect

  • Tickets with the question, relevant context and an owner
  • Review drafts with citations and a list of unresolved questions

Where judgment stays human

Missing answers, unconfirmed lead times, complaints and refund requests go to a person. Do not cite another customer’s records or invent service policies.

How to judge whether it works

Check classification, customer matching and citations. Count unsupported answers, incorrect routing and total handling time.

A packaging question: a reply with source references.

Workflow illustration · Fictional data

What starts it
Fictional example: a customer asks how X20 is packaged and whether an existing order can ship on its original date.
The intended path
Separate the product and order questions, match permitted sources and customer records, summarize the original messages and prepare a cited draft plus an order-verification ticket.
When it needs a person
Unconfirmed shipping status remains unresolved and goes to the order coordinator. Complaints, refunds and unsupported questions go to the appropriate owner.
How to check it
Check that both questions are retained, sources match the correct model and customer, unconfirmed dates are not promises and the ticket has an owner.

Questions, answered

Practical questions before committing to a project.

Will customers speak directly to AI?

That is a separate scope decision. A first pilot can assist your staff with summaries and drafts while all customer communication stays with the team.

What if the answer is not in our documents?

The request should be flagged for a person, with the missing information visible. It should not produce an authoritative answer without support.

Explore all solutions

Which recurring task
should work better?

Let’s talk